Now You Can See Rod Serling’s Version of “Planet of the Apes”

Finding out that Rod Serling was a screenwriter on the 1968 sci-fi classic “Planet of the Apes” often surprises his fans. And yet, as soon as they think of that legendary shock ending, it makes perfect sense.

Note, however, that I said “a” screenwriter. Although he was the first to begin the hard work of adapting Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel to the big screen, he would not be the only one.

That’s certainly not because the producers were unhappy with his work. Far from it. Serling worked on several drafts in the mid-1960s before bowing out of the project.

And even though the final product bears numerous changes, the basic story — including, yes, the ending — is the same. And we can thank Serling for that.

The history of how “Planet of the Apes” went from page to screen is a long and complicated one. It’s not my intention to delve into that here. It could fill a book all its own, frankly.

My focus is simply what would interest just about any fan of Serling and this famous film franchise: What if they had filmed Serling’s version with none of the changes made by screenwriter Michael Wilson?

That’s not to say Wilson wasn’t a talented writer. The man behind “The Bridge on the River Kwai” (also based on a Boulle novel) and other classic films was obviously no amateur when it came to screenplays. Still, Serling was a perfectly capable writer. What was the difference between the two versions, and why were Wilson’s contributions deemed necessary?

The main difference is one of tone. The other consideration was, quite simply, the budget — which, as so often happens in Hollywood, had to be trimmed considerably.

Serling, taking his cue from Boulle, depicted a modern ape civilization. Had his version of the script gone before the cameras, you’d have seen apes in clothes any human being would wear, walking around big cities, driving cars, etc. — basically our world, but with apes and humans having switched places.

Obviously that switch IS what we get in the completed film. But to make it a more economical shoot, the producers put the apes in a more primitive city (a “Flintstones” village, as some have called it). They’re walking or riding horses. It’s all a bit simpler.

Wilson was also responsible for the jokey dialogue we get — things like “I never met an ape I didn’t like,” and “Man see, man do.” Sight gags like the “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” tableau are his as well.

Now, like millions of other fans, I enjoy the film we got, so I’m not necessarily complaining. But as a Serling aficionado, I wish we could have seen the film as Serling wrote it.

We don’t have that (yet, anyway — couldn’t someone film it anyway?). But we have the next best thing: a graphic-novel adaptation of his script called “Planet of the Apes Visionaries” by Dana Gould and Chad Lewis.

There we can “read” the movie (and in less time than it would take to watch). We see that the basic structure is the same. We start with Taylor (here named Thomas) and his fellow astronauts landing on a strange world and wondering where and WHEN they are —- and end with Thomas gobsmacked before a familiar green statue.

Some details are the same, like Taylor/Thomas giving us an orienting narration at the beginning. One of the crew doesn’t survive hyper-sleep, as in the final film. But there are some notable differences. They have a sort of Land Rover to drive around in — at least before it gets caught in quicksand and disappears. In the film, they watch as their ship sinks in the small lake they landed in before setting off on foot.

As in the film, they find primitive humans and are pursued by ape hunters. But here the apes arrive in helicopters, not on horseback.

Also as in the film, Thomas is rendered mute (temporarily) during his capture, delaying the moment when the apes are shocked to discover that he can talk. But that moment doesn’t come with a growl about “damn dirty apes,” but with a simple “I can speak” message scrawled in blood on the wall of his cage. And the moment when they finally hear him speak comes as he’s being wheeled along on a hospital gurney.

The biggest difference, as Gould notes in his afterword, is the reveal of the ape city. As Serling described it in his script: “The truck moves slowly down the street. It passes stores with ape mannequins in the window; chimps and monkeys walking back-and-forth on the sidewalk; a gorilla policeman directing traffic; past a movie marquee with a large picture of two monkeys in a passionate embrace.”

There are more differences, of course, but I’ll let you discover them for yourself. Even if you’re the world’s biggest fan of the 1968 film, I believe you’ll find this alternate version fascinating. You may even like it better. I know I do. It’s certainly more cerebral and less cutesy than the film.

Serling never got to see his initial script filmed. Now, though, through the pages of a professionally drawn graphic novel, we can. Or we can at least get an idea of what it would have looked like. We can turn the pages and take a trip to that strange dimension where apes rule and man is displayed in his “natural habitat”.

Hmmm, I guess Homo sapiens AND simians are alike all over …

***

For a daily dose of Serling, you can follow me on TwitterFacebook or Pinterest. You can also get email notifications of future posts by entering your address under “Follow S&S Via Email” on the upper left-hand side of this post. WordPress members can also hit “follow” at the top of this page.

Hope to see you in some corner of the fifth dimension soon!

About Paul

Fanning about the work of Rod Serling all over social media. If you enjoy pics, quotes, facts and blog posts about The Twilight Zone, Night Gallery and Serling's other projects, you've come to the right place.

Posted on 09/26/2020, in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 12 Comments.

  1. Michael Poteet

    I am so glad to know about this GN! I’ll have to check it out. A great write-up, Paul.

    I’m also tickled to see the pic of Serling next to the statue of the Lawgiver. Back in 2018, I saw that same prop in person, in the private collection where it resided at the time, the collection of the late Wes Shank. Even had my picture taken with it. So now I can feel like I’ve been “in the presence” of not only the Lawgiver, but Serling! :)

    • Thanks, Mike! I think you’ll enjoy it. Btw, I had meant to include links when I first published this, but forgot them when I first published it. They’re in there now, if it helps you.

      And yes, that pic of Serling by the Lawgiver is one of my favorites. Glad you got a chance to see the prop in person. I’m envious!

  2. I love learning about the other projects Serling worked on. I didn’t know about this. I saw the movie when it first came out, but I don’t often watch it during the mini-marathons of the series. My favorite Serling screenplay outside of the Zone is “Seven Days in May.”

    I love the snippets from the book. I wonder if Serling had a thing for mannequins. I find them creepy, but I like the way he has used them. I might have to add this book to the wish list. Thanks for calling it to our attention, Paul.

    • You’re welcome, Dan. Like you, I really enjoy learning about Serling’s non-TZ projects. He really had a great talent, one that didn’t require the Zone for expression. And yes, “Seven Days in May” is an excellent movie.

      Glad you found the snippets interesting. I figured people would like getting a peek at it. And ha, yeah — more mannequins. They’re definitely creepy. That’s probably why he used them! Here’s hoping you get the book soon. Maybe if put it on your Christmas list, Henry Corwin will bring you a copy. :)

  3. Guy Thompson

    I’m noticing the Amazon website is selling only a Kindle version and if you click the “hardcover” options, it links to used copies of Pierre Boulle’s old novel. Will there be a printed edition or only digital?

    • Hi, Guy. Yes, I noticed the same thing. I’m pretty sure it’s just temporary — MY copy, which I got a month or so ago, is a HC edition. But then I saw Amazon saying it was out of stock — apparently for the moment, though. Not sure when they’ll be restocked. Although I do get a lot of digital books, I hope it won’t be long before the HC editions are back.

  4. It’s a great graphic novel, for sure (I have the hardcover). I’d suggest to anyone looking for a full understanding of what Serling brought to POTA to read the Boulle novel as well. It’s terrific on its own merits, but really fascinating as the template for what Serling and, later, Wilson did with it.

    • Agreed, Christopher. I plan to do a comparison post at some point, just as I’ve been doing with some of the Twilight Zones that Serling adapted from other stories.

  5. I ordered this right away when I first read about it last year. It’s such a great Graphic Novel. I’d love to see Serling’s vision live action at some point.

  6. Reblogged this on PRA Publishing and commented:
    Great lessons in hindsight! Thanks for posting!

  7. Cool post and good to know—will have to check that graphic novel out!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: